Metro received a great deal of input during the public comment period, and taking that into account along with the reality that some action must be taken, Metro has proposed a solution that balances the FY2011 budget as well as the interests of all in the region fairly.
The new Metro proposal would be to adopt the $89 million in fare adjustments in the General Manager's initial proposed budget. This is in keeping with the public comment received, as 70% of the on-line comments favored an increase in Metrobus fares and 80% favored an increase in Metrorail fares given the current budget situation.
There are several other adjustments in the new proposal. Among them are:
Metro is also proposing some changes to parking fees in the system. Under the proposal Metro would adopt a daily parking fee increase of 50 cents, at all facilities, which is less than half of what was considered in the docket. The proposal would also raise the reserved parking fees by $5 a month, which is half what was considered in the docket. Additionally, the General Manager would have the authority to increase the number of reserved parking spaces (up to 8% of all spaces) for stations at which all reserved parking slots have been sold. These changes are estimated to yield close to $6.75 million in revenue.
Up to 70% of the public input favored increased contributions from Metro's funding partners in the local jurisdictions, so the proposal asks that they contribute an extra $26 million, which is about 14% of the budget gap.
About 60% of the comments favored using some money from the capital budget for preventive maintenance, so we have proposed using $30 million in that way
Of those comments that favored using capital money in this way, half asked that it be repaid into the capital budget at a later date. The new proposal makes provisions for that. If Metro exceeds ridership projections for any quarter in FY2011, the surplus money earned will be placed in a reserve fund and returned to the capital budget in the next fiscal year.
Additionally, Metro is proposing a 5 cent surcharge at specific stations to collect money to be used for capital projects at those specific stations. This was supported in20% of the inputs received on-line, and there was specific support in the public hearing/written comment for doing this at the Union Station and the Tenleytown-AU Metrorail stations.
With the public's preferences in mind, the proposal limits the changes proposed for Metrorail and Metrobus service to about $8 million. To put this in context, that is less than half of the administrative cuts Metro will be making in order to balance the budget, and it accounts for only 4% of the budget gap.
These changes, many of which would be done as part of fine tuning bus service, Metro is able to make up $4.3 million of the budget gap, and still reinvest $2.6 million in improvements. Many of the changes are on routes with very low ridership, and many of the improvements are in response to requests from our customers to improve running times.
A. Details of Metrobus Service Adjustments ($4.3 million)
B. Details of Metrobus Service Improvements and reinvestment ($2.6 million)
Improvements
Reinvestment
Metrorail Service Adjustments
Realizing that service adjustments were the least popular method of reducing the budget gap, we have adopted only those that received the most public support on-line during the comment period, and as a result of the comments received at public hearings and in writing we have modified several of those service adjustment options.
On the rail side, about one third (33%) of the public input supported closing Metrorail earlier on weekends, so we have proposed to operate Metro until 2 a.m. rather than 3 a.m. On a given weekend night between 2 and 3 a.m. this service averages only about 2,400 riders.
One third (33%)of the public input supported service reductions on the day after Thanksgiving and the week between Christmas and New Years when ridership drops as low as 40-60% of normal weekday totals. Non-peak headways will remain unchanged, though during peak periods we will only run 6-car trains.
One quarter (25%) of the public inputs supported the idea of running Red Line trains every 3 minutes between Grosvenor and Silver Spring, and every 6 minutes between Silver Spring and Glenmont and between Grosvenor and Shady Grove. This change will actually improve reliability, bringing the schedule in line with the way the trains actually run. It will not reduce the number of people we carry as the number of 8 car trains will be increased.
About 28% of the public input supported closing one entrance at five Metrorail stations after 8 p.m. After consideration of the input, the option was limited to four of these stations: Stadium-Armory, McPherson Square, Friendship Heights, and King Street Metrorail stations at 8 p.m. The extra entrance at the Shaw-Howard Metrorail station will remain open. Additionally, the Stadium-Armory entrance will be open during events at the stadium.
About 36% of the public input supported closing a single entrance at 10 Metrorail stations with multiple entrances on weekends. This was modified and limited to closing a single entrance at eight stations. These entrances are: Anacostia North, Stadium Armory North, Navy Yard West, New York Avenue South, Friendship Heights South, L'Enfant Plaza West, King Street North, and Silver Spring North. The entrance at Stadium Armory North will remain open for stadium events.
About 25% of the public input supported changing the frequency of trains between 6 and 6:30 a.m. from six to eight minutes. This will be a reduction of just one trip in each direction on each line during this time period.
MetroAccess base fares will be increased at a rate comparable to twice the Metrobus fare, in keeping with current policy. About 55% of the public input supported some sort of increase in the MetroAccess fare, and 45% of the input showed for this option specifically.
The proposal for MetroAccess service is to continue providing service beyond the 3/4-mile ADA requirement, for current MetroAccess customers. New MetroAccess customers will only be eligible for service within the 3/4-mile area outlined in the federal law. For those customers receiving service outside the 3/4-mile area there will be an increased charge.
The proposal also eliminates of the free ride program for those customers who qualify for full MetroAccess eligibility, as they would qualify to take all trips via a MetroAccess vehicle.
These changes to our MetroAccess service policy should close the budget gap by an additional $6 million.
These are difficult times, and after careful consideration, balancing the public's input with the need to take action, Metro has put forward a proposal for the Metro Board's consideration that we hope everyone can accept as fair.